These are the mappable, workflow-shaped jobs that drain a broking back-office: the ones scored ≥70 on volume, repetitiveness, cost of error, data messiness, compliance load and integration difficulty. Each runs end-to-end against Acturis, cites its rules, and stops at a person when it matters.
The agent pulls the expiring cover and the renewal terms side by side, flags what moved on premium, excess, endorsements and subjectivities, then drafts the client-ready comparison against the workflow you mapped.

Routine client and insurer letters such as evidence-of-cover, chasing subjectivities and renewal reminders, drafted from your templates and versioned knowledge sheets. Nothing is invented; everything is grounded in the record.

A claims FNOL or query lands in the inbox; the agent finds the matching client and policy record, gathers the related documents, and assembles the acknowledgement so the handler starts from a complete picture, not a blank screen.

The endless part, re-keying risk data from an insurer PDF or schedule into Acturis, runs end-to-end, with a field-by-field read-back against the system of record so what was written matches what was intended.

Preparation for regulated filings, such as Motor Insurance Database updates, is assembled and checked, then held at a permanent hard gate. No regulator submission is ever auto-committed, and the whole run is on the ledger.

Across these workflows, our demo broker, Calderwell Insurance Brokers, hands back about 214 handler-hours a week: roughly 5.7 FTE of capacity and £223k a year, before counting rework and compliance-risk savings.